Disposed
Aruna Samantaray v. G.M, R.B.I, Bbsr, Khurda
Orissa HCCONTC/4090/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.4090 of 2022 (Through hybrid mode)
…. Mrs. Aruna Samantaray Applicant
Mr. A.K. Nath, Advocate
-versus-
…. The General Manager, Reserve Alleged Bank of India and others Contemners
Mr. B.N. Udgata, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
Order
ORDER 17.10.2022
No.
4.
1. Mr. Udgata, learned advocate appears on behalf of alleged
contemners and submits, there has been compliance. He tenders unqualified apology for the delay. Mr. Nath, learned advocate appears on behalf of applicant and confirms, there has been compliance.
2. Court accepts the apology and compliance.
3. The proceeding is dropped and the application, disposed of.
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
Sks
Page 1 of 1
Mrs. Aruna Samantaray
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court