This Court dismissed the Writ Petition for not entertaining the matter at a belated stage due to delay and laches, citing a prior judgment on similar grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 15913 of 2020
Biju Patnaik University of ….. Petitioner Technology, Odisha
Mr. S.J. Mohanty, Advocate
Vs.
Pabitra Kumar Swain & Ors.
….. Opposite parties
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
08.07.2022
Order No.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Alok / subhasmita
…………….…………..……. ( V. NARASINGH ) JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition should be entertained despite delay and laches spanning two years.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari DasReferred¶16
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari Das (W.P.(C) No. 15763 of 2021)
Biju Patnaik University of Technology, Odisha
Pabitra Kumar Swain & Ors.
B.R. Sarangi
V. Narasinh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
