irregularity can be said to have been committed by the authority. 6. Mr. B.S. Tripathy-1, learned counsel for the private opposite party no.1 contended that the resolutions, which have been relied upon by the Government in Annexures-4 and 5 dated 17.09.2013 and 16.01.2014 respectively, have no application to the present case, as the petitioner had joined as staff nurse on contractual basis pursuant to resolution dated 27.12.2008 under Annexure-2, which provides that for the purpose of regularization, regular posts of staff nurse may be created, which were abolished earlier in lieu of contractual appointment without creation of any additional post and such creation of regular posts, may be limited to the number of regular posts abolished earlier for contractual appointment. As such, the staff nurse who have completed six years of uninterrupted and continuous service may be appointed on regular post. Therefore, the petitioner, on completion of six year of service, is entitled to be regularized and, as such, the tribunal while passing the order also relied upon the resolution dated 21.09.2010, which has been annexed as Annexure-5 to the writ petition, wherein it has been clearly mentioned that the past services of contractual staff nurses working under various schemes like Swasthya Bikash Samiti, Rogi Kalyan Samit, ZSS, NRHM shall also be counted for computation of six years at the time of regularization, after their absorption against the post of contractual staff nurses under general health care, subject to proper verification of documents by the appointing authorities. It is contended that since the petitioner had joined in service under NRHM and on completion of six years, her service has been regularized in terms of the resolutions dated 27.12.2008 and
