Nirakar Sahoo v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 14217 of 2021
Nirakar Sahoo
….. Petitioner
Mr. Sumanta Kumar Nayak,
Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha & Ors.
Opposite parties Mr. P.P. Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER 08.03.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 5 2. Mr. P.P. Mohanty, learned Additional Government Advocate states that he has received instructions, vide letter dated 26.01.2022 from the Tahasildar, Odapada, wherein it has been stated as follows:-
“…. as per directions passed by Hon’ble High Court in W.P.(C) No. 11669/2021, Collector, Dhenkanal has been pleased to allow and settle the Source in favour of the petitioner-Sri Trupari Sahoo the 2nd highest bidder of the 1st Tender held on dated 03.02.2021 with a Additional charge @ 373/- per cubic meter. Accordingly Sri Tripurari Sahoo has deposited the required Govt. dues on 25.05.2021 and lease deed was made with Sri Tripurari Sahoo on 04.06.2021 and work order was issued on dated 09.07.2021 after obtaining Consent to Operate (CTO) from Regional Officer, State Pollution Control Board, Angul by the
2
Lessee Sri Sahoo. Since then Sri Sahoo is operating the Source.”
Ashok/Puspa
……………………...
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
…………….…………..…….
( SAVITRI RATHO )
JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.(C) No. 11669/2021Referred¶15
Nirakar Sahoo
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court