In this writ petition challenging a Family Court order that issued notice and stayed proceedings, the High Court held that no infirmity existed in the lower court action. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 18915 OF 2022 …. Lala Pramod Kumar Ray
…. Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
Mamata Ray
…. Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
08.09.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
ms
parte order dated 23rd November, 2020 by which Guardian Misc. Case No.9 of 2019 was disposed of. Thus, while issuing notice to the Petitioner in the said I.A., learned Judge, Family Court, Bhadrak stayed further proceeding of the execution case. 5. Hence, I find no infirmity in the impugned order under Annexure-5. The Petitioner pursuant to the notice issued in I.A. No.22 of 2022, may appear and file his show cause, which can be considered in accordance with law.
stands dismissed.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper
application.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order of the Family Court issuing notice in I.A. No.22 of 2022 and staying proceedings was infirm due to delay.
Whether the writ petition deserves to be dismissed or set aside.
Lala Pramod Kumar Ray
Mamata Ray
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
