Dismissed

Rashmi Rekha Jena v. Asha Jena

Orissa HC7 Sept 2022CMP/534/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged orders dismissing her appeal and earlier applications regarding half share in suit property. Court held observations in impugned orders were prima facie to ensure just adjudication, dismissed the challenge, and disposed of the common cause of action petition without interference.

What did the court decide?

Common cause of action petition disposed of without interfering with impugned orders.

Rashmi Rekha Jena Vs Asha Jena — Property and Title | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 534 OF 2022

¶2

Rashmi Rekha Jena

¶3

…. Petitioner

¶4

Mr. Saktidhar Das, Senior Advocate being assisted by Mr. M.M. Swain, Advocate

-versus-

Asha Jena

…. Opp. Party

CORAM:

JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

07.09.2022

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

¶15

The CMP has been filed assailing the order dated 8^th March, 2022 (Annexure-6) passed in F.A.O. No.07 of 2021, whereby learned Additional District Judge, Anandapur while dismissing the appeal confirmed the order dated 15^th December, 2021(Annexure-5) passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Anandapur in I.A. No.38 of 2021 (arising out of C.S. No.114 of 2021).

¶16

Mr. Das, learned Senior Advocate submits that the Petitioner is the widowed daughter-in-law of the Opposite Party. The Petitioner has filed C.S. No.114 of 2021 with a prayer for a declaration that she has half share in the suit Schedule-A property of the plaint. Along with the plaint, she filed an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. in I.A. No.38 of 2021, which was dismissed. Being aggrieved, the Petitioner filed F.A.O. No.7 of 2021. But, to her misfortune, the same was dismissed by learned Additional District Judge,

¶17

Page 1 of 2

¶18

// 2 //

¶19

Anandapur on 8^th March, 2022. It is his submission that interest of justice will be best served, if the suit is disposed of at an early date without being influenced by the observation made by learned trial Court as well as learned Appellate Court in the impugned orders under Annexures-5 and 6.

¶20

The observations made by learned trial Court as well as learned Appellate Court in the impugned orders under Annexures-5 and 6 are prima facie in nature, which are made for just adjudication of the case. The suit has to be decided by taking into consideration the material available on record including evidence, both oral and documentary, available before learned trial Court. Hence, apprehension of the Petitioner is baseless. 5. Accordingly, this Court without interfering with the impugned orders under Annexures-5 and 6 disposes of the CMP with the aforesaid observation.

¶21

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

¶22

(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge

¶23

¶24

Page 2 of 2

Rashmi Rekha Jena v. Asha Jena

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rashmi Rekha Jena v. Asha Jena

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Korikani Bhimaya Vs Bapa Durga Pratap Reddy

Nrusingha Parida Vs Kukuma Parida

Kandula @ Bora Sunitha Vs Bora Sudhakar Das

Harekrushna Behera Vs R.T.O., Balasore

Anirudha Behera Vs Bikash Mohan Barik

Bijaya Kumar Rout Vs Ashok Kumar Maity