This single-judge order dismisses the writ petition by analogy to a previously dismissed petition (W.P.(C) No. 17023 of 2012) based on agreed counsel submissions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.18903 of 2021
Hrusikesh Chand
Petitioner Mr. K. Swain, Adv.
Vs.
State of Odisha and others
Opposite Parties Mr. S. Jena, SC, S&ME
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
23.12.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 03
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Alok
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition must be decided independently or in light of a previously dismissed petition on analogous grounds.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Chandra Shekar Sahoo V. State of Odisha and OrsDistinguished¶14
W.P.(C) No. 17023 of 2012 ( Chandra Shekar Sahoo V. State of Odisha and Ors )
Hrusikesh Chand
State of Odisha and others
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
