Manorama Pradhan v. General Manager East
Case brief
What is this about?
A single-judge order correcting a typographical error in the record of appearance in a disposed writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Corrections were deemed made to the record of appearance in the disposed order dated 22.06.2022.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P(C) No.18869 of 2013 (Through hybrid mode)
Manorama Pradhan and another
…. Petitioners
Mr. J.K.Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
…. General Manager East Coast Opposite Parties Railway and another
Mr. Bhabani Shankar Rayaguru, Advocate (Central Government Counsel) ORDER 06.07.2022
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
Order No.
08. 1. This disposed of writ petition has been listed under heading ‘To Be Mentioned’ at instance of Mr. Rayaguru, learned advocate and Central Government Counsel. He submits, record of appearance in order dated 22nd June, 2022, disposing of the writ petition, carries inadvertent typographical error in mentioning Ms. B. Sahoo as appearing for opposite parties. It was he who had appeared.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manorama Pradhan
- petitioner
another
- respondent
General Manager East Coast Railway
- respondent
another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court