The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition regarding compensation for a railway accident death, holding that the same compensation direction as in the connected petition WP(C) no.18866 of 2013 applies.
Dimension for payment of compensation within four weeks of communication, same as in WP(C) no.18866 of 2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.18867 of 2013 (Through Hybrid mode)
Pradip Kumar Naik and another …. Petitioners
Mr. J. K. Mohapatra, Advocate -versus…. G.M. East Coast Railway and Opposite Parties another
Ms. B. Sahoo,
Central Government Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER
Order
22.06.2022
No.
07. 1. Mr. Mohapatra, learned advocate appears on behalf of
petitioners, who are the son and daughter-in-law of the deceased.
Death was by railway accident. He submits, there be same
direction for payment of compensation, as covered by order
made this day in WP(C) no.18866 of 2013 (Pratima @ P.
Nayak and another v. G.M. East Coast Railway and another) .
2022 in Pratima @ P.Nayak (supra). There will be same direction for the compensation to be paid within four weeks of
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
communication.
4. The writ petition is disposed of.
(Arindam Sinha) Judge
RKS
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners should receive the same compensation direction as in the connected writ petition WP(C) no.18866 of 2013.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pratima @ P.Nayak and another v. G.M. East Coast Railway and anotherFollowed¶8
WP(C) no.18866 of 2013 (Pratima @ P.Nayak and another v. G.M. East Coast Railway and another)
Pradip Kumar Naik
Pradip Kumar Naik and another
G.M. East Coast Railway
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
