This writ petition was dismissed as infructuous due to a common order passed in related matters (MATA No.97-99 of 2019) on the same day.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.18173 of 2016
Korrai Siva Prasad Rao @
Petitioner
K.S.P. Rao
Mr. S.K. Pradhan, Advocate
-versus-
Smt. M. Sarala @ Korrai
Opp.party
Sarala
Mr. T. Mishra along with
Mr. A.K.Nandy, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE M.S.SAHOO
ORDER
Order No. 03.08.2022
4 .
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2 . It has been stated by the Mr. S.K. Pradhan, learned
counsel for the petitioner that in view of the common order passed today in MATA No.97 of 2019, MATA No.98 of 2019 and MATA No.99 of 2019, this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
3 . Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
(S. Talapatra) Judge
(M.S. Sahoo) Judge
Gs/Radha
Korrai Siva Prasad Rao
Smt. M. Sarala
S. Talapatra
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
