The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition as the underlying grievance no longer subsisted during its pendency, disposing of the matter without further elaboration.
Disposal of the writ petition is the result as the grievance no longer subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 17690 OF 2013
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Odisha, Bhubaneswar.
……… Petitioner Mr. S. K. Pattnaik, Sr. Adv. -versus-
O.L.I.C. Ltd. & Ors.
...……… Opposite Parties Mr. P. Mohapatra, ASC Mr. S. Mohanty, Adv. For OP-1
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER 29.03.2022
Order No. 07. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned Senior Counsel Sri S.K. Pattnaik. That during the pendency of the matter in terms of the order passed by this Court, the grievance no longer subsists. 3. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. ( V.Narasingh ) Balaram Judge
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Odisha
O.L.I.C. Ltd.
V. Narasimh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
