Partly allowed
Anil Kumar Jena @ Buti v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCBLAPL/9151/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 9151 OF 2020
Anil Kumar Jena@Buti ……… Petitioner Mr. Manas Chand, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha
...……… Opposite Party Mr. K.K.Gaya, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
28.03.2022
Order No.
03. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. Mr. Chand, learned counsel for the Petitioner is permitted
to withdraw the present BLAPL with liberty to move this Court at
a later stage, if so advised.
4. The BLAPL is disposed of as withdrawn with the
aforesaid liberty.
( V.Narasingh )
Judge
Dhal
Anil Kumar Jena@Buti
State of Odisha
V. Narasingh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court