This single-judge order allowed a writ petition by relying on the reasoning in a related judgment disposed of on 09.09.2021 regarding an analogous issue.
The writ petition is allowed by relying on the judgment dated 09.09.2021 in W.P.(C) No. 19951 of 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No. 1762 of 2022
Sushil Kumar Kar & Ors.
….
Petitioners
Mr. S.K. Ojha, Advocate
-Versus -
Principal Secy. to Govt.-cum…. Opposite Parties Commnr., Housing & Urban Development Department & Ors.
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER_
21.01.2022
Order No.
01
Alok
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed based on the reasoning in a related judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Analogous issue judgmentFollowed¶3
W.P.(C) No. 19951 of 2020
Sushil Kumar Kar & Ors.
Principal Secy. to Govt.-cum…. Opposite Parties Commnr., Housing & Urban Development Department & Ors.
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
