A writ petition filed by Smt. Sriya Naik was heard via video conference. The court directed opposite party No.5 to consider the petitioner's representation regarding dues within three months, without expressing an opinion on merits.
Directed opposite party No.5 to consider the petitioner's representation and pass an appropriate order within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPC (OAC) No. 1322 of 2009
Smt. Sriya Naik
Petitioners Mr. S.B. Jena, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha and others …..
Opposite parties
State counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
21.01.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode. 1
2
order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020, as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021, and Court’s Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.
Ashok
(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to direction to disburse dues and interest representing grievances.
Whether the representation filed by the petitioner should be considered within a stipulated time.
Smt. Sriya Naik
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
