Petitioner sought compliance of an order extending service benefits to a work-charged establishment. Court directed petitioner to file a detailed representation with documents; respondent to dispose within three months.
No fresh representation to be filed within three weeks; respondent authority to dispose of the same within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.17430 of 2022
Bhramarbara Mohapatra
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties
COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
21.07.2022
Order No
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned
counsel for the Opposite Parties.
3. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:-
“(i) Why the Opposite Party No.1 will not directed to implement / comply the order dated 25.04.2017 passed under Annexure-4 i.e. by extending all service and financial benefits with effect from 01.03.2009 in the work charged establishment and accordingly sanction and disburse the arrear differential pay, within a stipulated time”.
4 . Considering the submission made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation before the Opposite Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three weeks hence.
5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the Opposite Party No.1 shall
// 2 //
do well to dispose of the representation within a period of three months. The decision so taken by the Opposite Party No.1 be communicated to the Petitioner within that time.
6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
Page 2 of 2
Bhramarbara Mohapatra
State of Odisha
Biraj Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
