Disposed

Kamal Prasad Mallick v. State of Orissa

Orissa HC21 Jul 2022WP(C)/15095/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition regarding regularization of the petitioner as an Assistant Driver, the Court, without expressing any opinion on merits, directed Opposite Party No.2 to decide the petitioner's representation within three months and dispose of the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

A direction was issued to Opposite Party No.2 to take a decision on the petitioner's representation within three months.

Kamal Prasad Mallick Vs State of Orissa — Service and Employment | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.15095 of 2022

¶3

Kamal Prasad Mallick

¶4

…. Petitioner

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Odisha & Ors.

¶7

…. Opposite Parties

¶8

CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

¶9

ORDER
21.07.2022
Order No
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement
(Virtual/Physical) Mode.

¶10

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

¶11

3 . The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:-

¶12

“ It is therefore humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the case, call for the records and after hearing both the parties pass the following reliefs;

¶13

i. to direct the Opp. Parties to regularize the services of the petitioners as Asst. Driver against a regular post from the date appointment i.e. on 4.11.2011.

¶14

ii. To direct the Opposite Parties to count the past services of the petitioner for the purpose of seniority and other consequential benefits.

¶15

iii. To direct the Opposite Parties to grant financial benefits from the date of appointment i.e. on 4.11.2011.

¶16

iv. And pass such other order/orders as may be deemed fit and proper.

¶17

// 2 //

¶18

And pass such other order/orders as may be deemed fit and proper for the interest of justice.

¶19

And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”

¶20

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation on 14.02.2022 at Annexure-4 to the Writ Petition before the O.P. No.2, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No.2 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.

¶21

5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No.2 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the Petitioner.

¶22

6 . The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶23

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge

¶24

Sneha

¶25

Page 2 of 2

Kamal Prasad Mallick v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamal Prasad Mallick v. State of Orissa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Agananda Bagh Vs State of Odisha

Minati Das Vs State of Orissa

Brajakishore Hota Vs State of Orissa

Avijit Kumar Samal Vs State of Odisha

Bhramarbara Mohapatra Vs State of Orissa

Baikuntha Mohanty Vs State of Orissa