Petitioner filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa. The court dismissed the petition for want of instructions from the petitioner's counsel appearing in the matter.
Writ petition dismissed for want of instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No.15711 of 2020
Pradeep Kumar Das
….. Petitioner Mr. S.B. Mohanty, Advocate
Vs.
State of Orissa and others ….. Opposite Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
14.09.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
02.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that he
has no instructions in the matter.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed for
want of instructions.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Alok/Subhasmita (G. SATAPATHY)
JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
Pradeep Kumar Das
State of Orissa
DR. B.R. SARANGI
G. SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
