Janmejay Nath v. Chief Engineer
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petitioner sought quashing of a tender for road maintenance. The court held the petition infructuous due to the expiry of the tender period by efflux of time.
Writ petitioner sought quashing of a tender for road maintenance. The court held the petition infructuous due to the expiry of the tender period by efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 15309 of 2014
Janmejay Nath
….. Petitioner Mr. R.C. Jena, Adv.
Vs.
Chief Engineer, Rural Works Department and others
….. Opposite parties
Mr. P.P. Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
04.03.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 04.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Ashok
(V. NARASINGH) JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
Janmejay Nath
Chief Engineer
DR. B.R. Saringi
V. Narasimha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court