This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 4536 of 2017
Lalan Prasad Gupta
….. Petitioner
Mr. P.C. Nayak, Advocate.
Vs.
….. State of Odisha and others Opposite parties Mr.P.P. Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
03.03.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
03
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that by
efflux of time the prayer made in this writ petition has become
infructuous.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as
infructuous.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Arun
(V. NARASINGH)
JUDGE
Lalan Prasad Gupta
State of Odisha
B.R. SARANGI
V. NARASINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
