Disposed
Rabindra Kumar Mallick v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCWP(C)/14418/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.14418 Of 2022 (Through hybrid mode)
Rabindra Kumar Mallick
Petitioner
Mr. S. Dash, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Ms. S. Pattnaik, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
Order
ORDER 24.06.2022
No.
1.
1. Mr. Dash, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client made representation dated 12th April, 2022 to the Collector (opposite party no.2), claiming compensation on damage caused to his property. The representation has not been considered. He seeks direction upon said opposite party to consider and deal with the representation.
2. Ms. Pattnaik, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State and submits, the representation will be duly considered.
3. Opposite party no.2 is directed to consider and deal with the representation. Within four weeks of communication either Page 1 of 1
// 2 //
compensation is to be paid or reasons for rejection of whole or part of the claim, informed to petitioner.
4. The writ petition is disposed of.
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
Sks
Page 2 of 2
Rabindra Kumar Mallick
State of Odisha
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court