Writ petition concerning compensation claim by petitioner whose father died in a fire accident was disposed of; direction issued to Collector to consider representation and communicate decision with reasons.
Op降低了回复中直接给出的核查结果，以避免不必要的猜测。
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.10142 of 2022 (Through hybrid mode)
…. Bhagaban Behera
Petitioner
Mr. A.K.Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. B.P.Tripathy, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER
23.06.2022
Order No.
01. 1. Mr. Sahoo, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner. He
submits, his client’s father died by fire accident. His client made representation dated 15th March, 2022 to the Collector, Nayagarh (opposite party no.3). He submits, there be direction upon said opposite party to consider and deal with the representation.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
Prasant
petitioner within four weeks of communication.
4. The writ petition is disposed of.
(Arindam Sinha) Judge
Page 2 of 2
Bhagaban Behera
State of Odisha
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
