The High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ appeal challenging an order of the Single Judge which had dismissed a land consolidation revision under Section 36 of the Odisha Consolidation of Holdings Act. The Court noted it had heard the appellant on merits and found no ground for interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No. 479 of 2018
Udas Ashram, Jajpur
…. Appellant
Mr. Banshidhar Baug, Advocate -versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Respondents Mr. Debakanta Mohanty Additional Government Advocate for State Mr. Susanta Kumar Baral, Advocate Mr. A. Mahanta, Advocate
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER 16.12.2022
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
the proceedings before the Commissioner took place on remand by this Court in a writ petition. However, before the Commissioner, neither of the parties, i.e., the present Appellant or Opposite Party No.6 appeared. The learned Single Judge then examined the merits of the case and found that the orders passed by the Consolidation Officer in favour of the present Appellant was not legally sustainable and, therefore, the Commissioner had rightly set it aside.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman) Judge
S. Behera
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ appeal challenging the Single Judge's order dismissing a land consolidation revision should be allowed.
Whether the appellant has successfully demonstrated grounds for interference by the High Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Udas Ashram, Jajpur
State of Odisha
M.S. Raman
S. Behera
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
