This order states that the impugned order dated 3rd February, 2022 being appealable, the Court is not inclined to interfere at this stage. The writ petition disposed being allowed to avail of said remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 28870 of 2022
Harish Chandra Hota
…. Petitioner
Mr. Pranaya Kishore Harichandan, Advocate
-versus-
…. CT & GST Officer, Koraput Circle and Opposite Parties others
Mr. S.K. Pradhan, Additional Standing Counsel for OP Nos.1&2 Mr. Avinash Kedia, Jr. Standing Counsel for OP Nos.3 & 4
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
Order No.
ORDER 15.12.2022
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman) Judge
S. Behera
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can dispose of the writ petition without interference pending availability of appellate remedy.
Harish Chandra Hota
CT & GST Officer, Koraput Circle
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
