The High Court of Odisha condoned the delay in filing the writ appeal and allowed the present appeal referencing a common judgment, setting aside the impugned single judge order.
Delay in filing writ appeal condoned; impugned order of Single Judge set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No.412 of 2012
The Food Corporation of India, Bhubaneswar and another
…. Appellants
Mr. D. Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
M/s. Vijaya Traders
…. Respondent
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
20.07.2022
Order No.
Misc. Case No.809 of 2014
W.A. No.412 of 2012
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
S.K. Guin
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the writ appeal should be condoned.
Whether the present writ appeal should be allowed in view of a common judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Food Corporation of India, Bhubaneswar v. M/s. Binayak Food ProductsRelied on¶3
Food Corporation of India, Bhubaneswar v. M/s. Binayak Food Products
2 provisions across 2 enactments
The Food Corporation of India, Bhubaneswar
M/s. Vijaya Traders
M/s. Binayak Food Products
DR. S. Muralidhar
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
DR. S. Muralidhar and R.K. Pattanaik
Parties & counsel
