The petitioner's counsel stated that the petition is now infructuous due to subsequent developments. The court disposed of the writ petition accordingly without delivering a separate judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.26499 of 2019
Nirmal Gorana
…. Petitioner
Mr. Omkar Devdas, Advocate -versus-
…. Union of India and others Opposite Parties Mr. Ishwar Mohanty, ASC Mr. K.C. Kar, Advocate for O.P.No.1
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER 19.07.2022 Order No. 01. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that on account of the subsequent developments, the petition has been rendered infructuous and it is disposed of as such. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R. K. Pattanaik) Judge
TUDU
Nirmal Gorana
Union of India and others
R. K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
