This Order addressed delay of 384 days in filing W.A. No. 333 of 2011 and Misc. Case No.513 of 2011. The High Court held no convincing explanation existed and dismissed the writ appeal and miscellaneous case due to uncondonable delay.
Dismissal of W.A. No. 333 of 2011 and Misc. Case No.513 of 2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No. 333 of 2011
State of Orissa and another …. Appellants
Mr. Dipti Ranjan Mohapatra, Senior Standing Counsel School & Mass Education
-versus-
…. Khemeswar Secondary Training School Respondents and another
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER Order No. 26.04.2022 02. Misc. Case No.513 of 2011 and W.A. No.333 of 2011
There is no convincing explanation given for the inordinate delay of 384 days in filing this writ appeal. Accordingly, the delay is not condoned. Misc. Case No.513 of 2011 is dismissed. Consequently, the writ appeal is dismissed.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R. K. Pattanaik) Judge
S. Behera
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 384 days in filing writ appeal can be condoned?
State of Orissa and another
Khemeswar Secondary Training School and another
R. K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
