The revision petition was dismissed on the ground that the tax amount involved was insignificant, leading the question of law to remain open for a suitable future case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK STREV No.362 of 2008
State of Orissa, represented through …. Petitioner the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Cuttack
Mr. Sunil Mishra, ASC
-versus-
…. M/s. Raptakos Brett & Co., Cuttack Opposite Party None
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 26.04.2022
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
M. Panda
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of Orissa represented through the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Cuttack
M/s. Raptakos Brett & Co., Cuttack
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
