In this revision petition, the High Court of Orissa disposed of the matter as non-prosecution after noting that defects had remained uncured for over twelve years. No substantive legal issues were engaged.
Revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
STREV No. 480 of 2008
M/s. Dixit Oil Industry
…. Petitioner
None
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opposite Party Mr. Sidharth Shankar Padhy, ASC
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
Order No.
20.06.2022
S. Behera
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow a revision petition filed after a twelve-year delay where defects were not cured.
M/s. Dixit Oil Industry
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
