In a Saskatchewan Stringent Revision Petition, the Chief Justice of the Orissa High Court dismissed the petition without entertaining it due to the insignificant tax amount involved, leaving the question of law for future consideration and vacating the interim order.
Revision petition dismissed; interim order vacated; LCR returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
STREV No.31 of 2015
M/s. Kanaka Durga Foods (Pvt.) …. Petitioner Limited
None
-versus-
…. State of Odisha Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Pradhan, A.S.C.
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER Order No. 06.12.2022 06. 1. At the request of Mr. C.S. Mishra, learned counsel earlier appearing for the Petitioner, his name be deleted from the brief. 2. The tax amount being insignificant, the Court does not consider it appropriate to entertain the present revision petition. However, the question of law urged is left open for consideration in some other appropriate case. 3. Accordingly, the STREV is disposed of. The interim order passed earlier stands vacated. LCR be returned forthwith. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M.S. Raman) Judge
S.K. Guin
2 issues framed by the court
Whether this Court should entertain the revision petition in view of the insignificant tax amount involved.
Whether the question of law urged should be considered in the present revision or left open for a future appropriate case.
M/s. Kanaka Durga Foods (Pvt.) Limited
State of Odisha
M.S. RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
