In a review petition before the High Court of Orissa, the learned counsel for the petitioner had no instructions. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
The review petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RVWPET No. 25 of 2016
Shayam Sundar Mishra …. Petitioner
Mr. A.K. Tarai, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and Others Opposite Parties
Mr. Nikhil Pratap, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER
Order No. 06.12.2022
02. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that he has no instructions
in the matter.
2. The review petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman)
Judge
S.K. Jena/Secy.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a review petition be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Shayam Sundar Mishra
State of Odisha and Others
Chief Justice Justice M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
