Kadambini Dey v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Odisha dismissed the appeal against a decree confirming the original suit title and possession rights of the Respondent over suit land purchased in auction. Lack of rebuttal to documents proved Plaintiff's title.
What did the court decide?
Appeal stands dismissed. Judgments and decrees of Courts below confirmed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RSA No.191 of 2013
In the matter of an appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure assailing the judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge, Baleswar in R.F.A. No.185 of 2011 confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.07.2011 and 04.08.2011 respectively passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Balasore in Civil Suit No.324 of 2002-I.
….
Smt. Kadambini Dey & Another Appellants
-versus-
….
State of Odisha & Another Respondents
Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement
(Virtual/Physical Mode):
For Appellants - M/s.A.P. Bose, R.K. Mahanta,
N. Hota, V. Kar, D. Sahoo
S.S. Routray
For Respondents - Mr.G.N. Rout,
(ASC for R.1)
M/s.S.K. Mishra, J. Pradhan,
S.K. Rout, D.K. Pradhan,
S.D. Prasad Mohapatrartra
(For R.2)
CORAM: MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
Date of Hearing : 14.03.2022 : Date of Judgment:16.03.2022
The Appellants, by filing this Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, ‘the Code’) judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge, Baleswar in R.F.A. No.185 of 2011.
Page 1 of 6
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Courts below were right in holding that the Appellant does not have right, title and interest over the suit land due to lack of acceptable evidence regarding its auction to a predecessor?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Kadambini Dey & Another
- respondent
State of Odisha
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court