This judgment dismisses the petitioner's second application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., holding it not entertainable due to no change in circumstances since the court's earlier order.
Application dismissed as not entertainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL NO.15529 OF 2020
Suhail Md.
…. Petitioner Mr. D. Routray, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Another
…. Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Nayak, AGA.
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH ORDER
Order No.
15.03.2022
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
(D. Dash), Judge.
Narayan
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the second application for anticipatory bail stands dismissed in the absence of change in circumstances.
Whether the present application is entertainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suhail Md.
State of Odisha
D. Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
