The petitioner sought a direction to cancel a GPA executed in favor of Opposite Party No. 6. The Court held that the Writ Court lacks competence to entertain such a prayer and dismissed the petition as devoid of merit.
The prayer for cancelling the GPA is dismissed as the Writ Court is not competent to entertain it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) NO. 3647 OF 2022
Bijaya Swain
…. Petitioner
Mr. Achyutananda Swain, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opp. Parties Mr. Swayambhu Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
20.09.2022
bks
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can exercise writ jurisdiction to cancel the Global Patent Assignment (GPA) executed in favor of a third party.
Bijaya Swain
State of Odisha
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
