The Court observed that the interim maintenance order was under challenge, and this proceeding should have been registered as CRLMP instead of RPFAM. The office was directed to convert the RPFAM to CRLMP and list the matter before the assigned Bench.
Direction to the Office to convert RPFAM No.260 of 2022 to CRLMP and list it before the assigned Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No.260 of 2022
Jitendra Kumar Pradhan
…. Petitioner Mr.Amitav Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
Ranu Jena and another
…. Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No. 25.11.2022
1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
2. Since the order of interim maintenance is under
challenge in this RPFAM, it should have been registered as
CRLMP instead of RPFAM.
3. Accordingly, Office is directed convert the RPFAM to
CRLMP and the matter may be listed before the assigned
Bench.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
s.s.satapathy
Page 1 of 1
Jitendra Kumar Pradhan
Ranu Jena
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
