Petitioner recalled maintenance application challenging salary recovery order below. Court allowed withdrawal of recall application to enable petitioner to move reconsideration petition in lower court.
RPFAM allowed and disposed of as withdrawn to enable petitioner to approach the Family Court for reconsideration of recovery amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No.300 of 2022
Ganeswar Murmu
…. Petitioner
Mr.Dharmendra Sethy, Advocate
-versus-
Seema Baskey
…. Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA ORDER
Order No.
24.11.2022
s.s.satapathy
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the recall maintenance application is to be quashed to allow the petitioner to file an application for reconsideration of salary recovery.
Whether to allow withdrawal of the pending recall maintenance application.
Ganeswar Murmu
Seema Baskey
K.R. MOHAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
