This is a brief writ petition ruling where the court received no instructions from the petitioner's counsel and dismissed the petition accordingly, granting liberty to file again.
Liberty granted to approach the Court again if cause of action arises in future.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
O.J.C. No.5646 of 2002
Dibakar Sahoo
…. Petitioner(s)
Mr. P.K. Patnaik, Advocate
-versus-
Asst. Registrar, Cooperative Societies & Anr.
…. Opposite Party(s)
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
Order No.
23.03.2022
1. It is submitted by the learned counsel for Petitioner that he has no instruction in the matter. Memo to that effect filed in Court today be kept on record.
2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed for no instruction. Liberty is, however, granted to the Petitioner to approach this Court again in the event any cause of action involving this issue arises in future.
(Biswanath Rath) Judge
A.K. Jena
Page 1 of 1
Dibakar Sahoo
Asst. Registrar, Cooperative Societies & Anr.
Biswanath Rath
A.K. Jena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
