Rashmi Rout v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK…
What did the court decide?
Petitioner's request to rename the Civil Miscellaneous Petition as CMAPL was directed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
C.M.P. No.817 of 2021
Rashmi Rout
Petitioner(s) Dr.C.Misra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.. …. Opposite Party(s)
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
22.03.2022
Order No.
- Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wants to change the nomenclature of this Civil Miscellaneous Petition to one CMAPL. Considering the request of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court directs the Registry to register this Civil Miscellaneous Petition as CMAPL and place it accordingly.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rashmi Rout
- respondent
State of Odisha & Ors..
Coram
Biswanath Rath
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court