The High Court of Orissa allowed the appellant's request to withdraw a pending appeal. Consequently, the appeal stood dismissed as withdrawn with no legal questions resolved.
Leave to withdraw the appeal allowed; the appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MATA No.117 of 2020
Manoj Senapati ..……. Appellant Mr. A. Pattanaik, Advocate
Soyam Senapati & another
-Versus- ..……. Respondents
Mr. D. Nayak, Addl. Government Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
21.12.2022
Order No. 04.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Mr. A. Pattanaik, learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memorandum seeking leave to withdraw the appeal. The memorandum is taken on record.
3. We do not find any impediment to allow the appellant to withdraw this appeal.
4. Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(S. Talapatra) Judge
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Subhasis
2
Manoj Senapati
Soyam Senapati & another
S. Talapatra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
