Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner vacated the questioned land under an amicable settlement, satisfying the opposite party's paramount interest.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous as the petitioner vacated the land.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 29951 of 2022
M/s. Shree Transport, Cuttack
..……. Petitioner Mr. P.P. Behera, Advocate
Versus State of Odisha & Others ..…….. Opposite Parties Mr. D. Nayak, AGA Mr. P.K. Sahoo, Advocate Mr. Sidhant Dwibedi, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
20.12.2022
Order No.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Mr. P. P. Behera, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that in terms of the amicable settlement, the petitioner has vacated the questioned land.
3. The said statement has also been supported by Mr. Sidhant Dwibedi, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.5 whose interest is paramount in the land.
4. In view of this development, as reported, we dispose of this writ petition as infructuous, as nothing remains to be adjudicated further.
5. Mr. D. Nayak, learned Additional Government Advocate appears for the opposite party no.1 and Mr. P.K. Sahoo, learned counsel appears for the opposite party no.2-TP Central Odisha Distribution Ltd. (TPCODL).
Page 1 of 2
2
6. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
(Savitri Ratho)
puspa
Judge
Page 2 of 2
M/s. Shree Transport, Cuttack
State of Odisha
S. Talapatra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
