This appeal against an MACT award regarding motor accident compensation. The court directed the insurer to deposit an additional Rs. 11 lakh, which would be distributed by the Tribunal after accounting for future prospects and loss of consortium.
Respondent No.2 directed to deposit Rs. 11,00,000/- with the Tribunal for disbursement to claimants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MACA No.985 of 2018
Gitanjali Nayak and another …. Appellants Mr. B. Singh, Advocate
-versus-
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and …. Respondents others
Mr. B. Dasmohapatra, Advocate for Respondent No.2 Mr. G.C. Samantaray, Advocate for Respondent No.1
CORAM:
JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 11.08.2022
Order No.
Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3
months from today; where-after the same shall be disbursed to the claimants on such terms and proportion to be decided by the learned Tribunal.
B.K. Barik
( B.P. Routray)
Judge
Page 3 of 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether future prospects and adequate compensation for loss of consortium were appropriately assessed.
Whether the insurers are directed to deposit further consolidated sum for disbursement to claimants.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gitanjali Nayak
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
