R.D.,E.S.I.C. v. Kasinath Mohanty
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge disposed of Appeal No.715 of 2001 as infructuous because the counsel submitted that Respondent No.1 is no longer in existence.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MA No.715 of 2001
The Regional Director, Employees …. Appellants State Insurance Corporation, Bhubaneswar and another
Mr. A.P. Ray, Advocate
-versus-
…. Kasinath Mohanty and another Respondents
CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 11.08.2022 Order No. 08. 1. Mr. A.P. Ray, learned counsel for the Appellant submits that Respondent No.1 is presently non-existent as per the information received by him and as such, the appeal has become infructuous. 2. In view of the submission, the appeal is disposed of as infructuous. ( B.P. Routray) Judge
B.K. Barik
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The Regional Director, Employees
- appellant
State Insurance Corporation, Bhubaneswar and another
- respondent
Kasinath Mohanty
- respondent
another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court