The High Court allowed a miscellaneous application and dismissed the appeal against an award of Rs.12,000/-, holding that the amount was too low to warrant interference.
Miscellaneous case disposed of; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MACA No. 940 of 2005
…. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Appellant Mr. G.P. Dutta, Advocate -versus-
…. Raju Muralidhar Gudke and Others Respondents
None
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER Order No. 02.09.2022 Misc. Case No.684 of 2006 04. 1. For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed. 2. The Misc. Case is disposed of. MACA No.940 of 2005 3. Since the awarded amount is Rs.12,000/-, the Court does not consider it appropriate to interfere in the matter. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed leaving the question of law open for decision in other appropriate case.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
S.K. Jena/Secy.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should interfere in the matter where the awarded amount is Rs.12,000/-?
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
Raju Muralidhar Gudke and Others
Dr. S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
