Sitaram Sahu v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Orissa quashed criminal proceedings (G.R. Case No.257 of 2012) pending against the petitioner by the respondent due to pendency of civil disputes. The interim order was vacated and the respondent directed to communicate to the court.
What did the court decide?
Quashing of G.R. Case No.257 of 2012; Vacation of interim order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 4282 of 2014
Sitaram Sahu and another
…. Petitioners
Mr. B.K. Ragada, Advocate
-versus-
…. Opposite Parties Mr. Ishwar Mohanty, ASC Mr. Soubhagya Kumar Dash, Advocate
State of Orissa and another
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Order No.
ORDER 02.09.2022
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings instituted against each party can be quashed due to pendency of civil disputes between them.
Whether the impugned order quashing the criminal proceedings is sustainable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sitaram Sahu
- respondent
State of Orissa
Coram
Dr. S. Muralidhar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court