The appeal was declared infructuous and the order recorded accordingly. No substantive legal proposition or relief was granted as the proceeding was disposed of without an expression of opinion on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MACA No.841 of 2006
….
A. Nageswar Rao and others Appellants
M/s. B. P. Das and associates, Advocates
-versus-
…
Lingaraj Patra and another Respondents
None
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
Order No. 09.09.2022
03. Learned counsel appearing for the Appellants states that the appeal
has been rendered infructuous. It is disposed of as such.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
M. Panda
A. Nageswar Rao and others
Lingaraj Patra and another
Dr. S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
