The High Court of Orissa disposed of a First Appeal filed by Debendra Sabar challenging an order requiring 90% of compensation to be kept in fixed deposit. Cir FAO No.262 of 2020.
The appeal against the direction to keep 90% compensation in fixed deposit is dismissed; the appellant is directed to keep 50% in fixed deposit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
FAO No.431 of 2022
Debendra Sabar
…. Appellant Mr. S. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India and another
…. Respondents Mr. A.K. Mohanty, C.G.C. for UoI
CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
14.11.2022
Order No.
I.A. No.671 of 2022
FAO No.431 of 2022
Page 1 of 2
compensation amount in fixed deposit is covered by a similar judgment of this Court.
( B.P. Routray)
Judge
B.K. Barik
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal is condonable.
Whether the present appeal challenging the direction to keep 90% of compensation in fixed deposit is maintainable in light of prior judgments.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
FAO No.262 of 2020Followed¶6
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Debendra Sabar
Union of India
B. P. Routray
B.K. Barik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
B. P. Routray and B.K. Barik
Parties & counsel
