Appeal filed with a delay of 2050 days challenging the dismissal of a claim application for lack of adequate proof. Court dismissed the limitation petition and the appeal due to insufficient reason for condoning delay.
Limitation petition dismissed; appeal dismissed on the ground of limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MACA No.998 of 2019
Sisa Subarna and Others
…. Appellants
Mr. Ramesh Ch. Pradhan, Advocate
-versus-
T.P. Krishna Raju and Another
…. Respondents
Mrs. P. Mishra, counsel for Respondent No.2
CORAM:
SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
10.11.2022
Order No.
I.A. No.1771 of 2019 & MACA No.998 of 2019
M.K.Panda
( B.P. Routray)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal is justified.
Sisa Subarna and Others
T.P. Krishna Raju
Respondent No.2 (insurer)
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
