Disposal of an application seeking correction of clerical and typographical errors in a prior judgment of the High Court regarding a Section 138 N.I. Act matter.
Correction of specific lines and paragraphs in the date 05.05.2022 judgment regarding references to the petition vs complaint and case numbers.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLREV No.768 of 2017
Basanta Kumar Behera
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and another Opposite Parties Mr. P.C. Das, A.S.C. Mr. U.C. Jena, Advocate for O.P. No.2
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
30.06.2022
I.A. No.317 of 2022
// 2 //
2016” and in 9th line of said para “and Section 138 of the N.I. Act” be deleted, paragraph-4 3rd line the words “Section 138 of N.I. Act” be deleted and paragraph-7 5th line “(Annexure-5)” instead of “(Annexure-1)” and the same line the figure “253/2016” instead of “256/2016 (Annexure-2)”.
( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge
Jagabandhu
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Basanta Kumar Behera
State of Odisha
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
