Allowed

Pradeep Kumar Behera v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC4 May 2022BLAPL/6321/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner involved in a narcotics offence under the N.D.P.S. Act. The court noted the long period of detention, lack of trial commencement, and absence of similar prior proceedings, directing release upon furnishing a bond and sureties with strict supervision conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on Rs. 50,000 bond with two sureties, subject to strict reporting and supervision conditions.

Pradeep Kumar Behera Vs State of Odisha — Narcotics (NDPS) | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

BLAPL No.6321 of 2021

¶3

Pradeep Kumar Behera …. Petitioner Mr.S.R.Mohapatra, Advocate

¶4

-versus-

¶5

State of Odisha

¶6

…. Opposite Party Mr. M.K.Mohanty, A.S.C.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

04.05.2022

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned Additional Standing Counsel.

¶15

This is an application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the Petitioner for bail in connection with Tikabali P.S.Case No.57 of 2020 corresponding to C.T. Case No.50 of 2020 pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge-cumAdditional District & Sessions Judge, Baliguda for alleged commission of offence under Sections 20 (b) (ii) C of the N.D.P.S.Act.

¶16

The Prosecution case in brief is that on 19.09.2020 at about 10.45 P.M. the informant got information that two persons were transporting ganja in their Renult Duster car bearing Regd.No.OD05-F-9527 from Puburia towards Cuttack. It is alleged that at about

¶17

// 2 //

¶18

1.30 P.M. the informant found a car was coming in high speed and she gave signal to stop the vehicle. The Petitioner stopped the car near Tengelepathar Chhak. On being asked the Petitioner, who was driving the car disclosed his name and identity. The informant searched the car and found four number of plastic bags containing ganja were kept on the back side seat of the car. After arrival of the Magistrate search was conducted after observing all the formalities and 89 kg.680 grams of ganja was seized excluding the bags and the Petitioner was arrested.

¶19

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner is languishing in custody since 20.09.2020, Further he submits that the investigation has been concluded in the meantime and charge sheet has been filed keeping the investigation open under section 173(8) Cr.P.C. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the trial has not commenced and the Petitioner is languishing for more than one and half years. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is a poor driver and on the instruction of the owner of the vehicle he was driving the vehicle.. Since persons were in the vehicle however the person to whom contraband ganja belong, got down on the way and the Petitioner was driving the vehicle while the Police intercepted him. He further submits that the Petitioner has no criminal antecedents of similar nature and that he belongs to the locality. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that since the Petitioner is a permanent inhabitant of Cuttack district, there is no chance of absconding or fleeing from receiving justice and in the event of his release, he will appear before the trial court on each date of posting of the case.

¶20

Learned Additional Standing Counsel vehemently opposes

¶21

// 3 //

¶22

the prayer for bail of the Petitioner and submits that illegal trafficking of contraband articles is rising day by day and no leniency should be shown to the Petitioner or similarly situated persons. Moreover the Petitioner was apprehended at the spot.

¶23

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, considering the fact and circumstances of the case and the period of custodial detention of the Petitioner and keeping in view the fact that trial has not commenced, I am inclined to grant bail to the Petitioner and it is directed that let the Petitioner be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand) with two local solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of

¶24

the learned court in seisin over the matter subject to the following terms and conditions:

¶25

i) he shall not indulge himself in any similar nature of offence.

¶26

ii) shall appear before the trial court on each and every date fixed by the trial court till conclusion of trial.

¶27

iii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. iv) shall not influence or threaten any prosecution witnesses while on bail.

¶28

v) he shall appear before the Atjhagarh Police Station once in a week preferably on Sunday in between 10 A.M. to 1 P.M. for one month and once in a fortnight between the said period till conclusion of trial.

¶29

vi) Violation of any of the terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

¶30

The trial court may impose any other condition(s) as deem fit and proper.

¶31

It is further directed that the bail granted to the Petitioner is subject to the condition that learned court below shall verify whether

¶32

// 4 //

¶33

the Petitioner has any criminal antecedents of similar nature. In the event it is found that the Petitioner has any criminal antecedents of similar nature, this bail order shall automatically stand revoked.

¶34

BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

¶35

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

¶36

RKS

¶37

( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge

Pradeep Kumar Behera v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Kumar Behera v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajit Kumar Dalai Vs State of Odisha

Bishnu Charan Sutar Vs Union of India

Sridhar Kumar Pattnaik Vs State of Odisha

Babu Singh Vs State of Odisha

Prasanta Majhi Vs State of Odisha

Sk.Sadir Vs State of Odisha