Sukanta Ku.Ray v. State of Orissa
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the petitioner argued that the case had become infructuous. The Single Judge dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.5053 of 2015
Sukanta Kumar Ray … Petitioner Mr.C.Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
. State of Orissa & another Opp.Parties Ms.S.Patnaik, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
ORDER
16.09.2022
Order No.
04. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the matter has
been rendered infructuous.
2. The CRLMC is dismissed as having infructuous.
(Chittaranjan Dash)
Judge
B.C.Mohanty
Sukanta Kumar Ray
State of Orissa
Chittaranjan Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court