Sukria Mallick v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The single-judge bench of the High Court of Orissa quashed the deadlock F.I.R. and corresponding Magistrate case on the basis of an affidavit by the respondent admitting marriage and living together without further proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Quashing of Dharmasala P.S. Case No. 433 (31) of 2008 and corresponding G.R. Case No- 898 of 2008.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 486 of 2013
Sukria Mallick@ Sukuria Mallick
…. Petitioner
Mr. R. Chowdhury, Advocate -versus-
State of Orissa and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Muduli, AGA
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
Order No.
20.05.2022
- The Opposite Party No.2 has filed an affidavit in this Court admitting that she and the Petitioner have married, and are living together as husband and wife and she does not want any further proceedings against the Petitioner.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR and corresponding Magistrate case should be quashed on admission of marriage by the respondent wife.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sukria Mallick
- respondent
State of Orissa
Coram
S. Muralidhar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court